International Law
Submitted by Wayne on Mon, 2008-08-18 07:16.
Politics
Like Georgia, the U.A.E. appeals to international law in its dispute with Iran over Abu Mousa. The mistake they make is this: such an appeal assumes a rule-of-law philosophy at work in all concerned parties. Iran has amply demonstrated it does not follow this philosophy.
Rule-of-law is a rejected concept to tyrants and bullies, whether they be Russian or Muslim (those who are fundamentally faithful to the Koran). The civilized world (what of it that remains) would do well to learn this basic truth. Like sociopaths, the only lasting solution, when disciplining those failing to submit to rule-of-law, is force and death.
Trackback URL for this post:
http://tuscanycircle.net/trackback/1201













doctrinal contribution
This is one of many contributions by Christianity to civilization. All men are subject to the Lord's judgment, and so rule-of-law becomes a natural derivative of Biblical doctrine. This is not to say New Testament doctrine was the first to assert or imply rule-of-law, but that Christianization of the world would have this positive effect (among countless others).